![]() I think the problem is that many people don't understand the market positioning - even my cousin a pro photographer didn't know why he needed Lightroom. There really is an opportunity here for affinity to add this to their portfolio of apps. It was a one off cost until the next version came out and was still more expensive than the adobe plan as well. I'd pay more if it was a one off cost of course, but again the example shown for a one off cost, was not actually a one off cost. I'd challenge anyone who said there was to explain (I'm interested, but am jaded by what I've seen so far). ![]() ![]() You choose.įor these reasons there is still not a decent replacement for Lightroom available in the market today unless you want to pay more than the Lightroom bundle. So either the Adobe photography plan is a very good deal or the other products are very expensive. And these surprisingly expensive products were only replacing half of the suite that you get with adobe lightoom portion only not photoshop. It is not a solution to want to leave Lightroom to get away from the cost of a subscription to then end up with an even more expensive product. The rest are either the same or have something else wrong, the better ones that come close to Lightroom are just too expensive (and surprisingly not just a little bit more expensive, a lot more expensive). The best is still Exposure, but it's very slow and therefore also is not a good fit given the primary task is to be able to quickly dive in and filter, sort and scroll hundreds of thousands of images. Some people will argue with that but my justification is as follows: there is always something major wrong or missing. ![]() Yeah, I looked at all the examples given to me in this thread and a few others, downloading them all to try out and for my need there really doesn't exist a solution today. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |